Pages

Monday, July 15, 2013

Conflict and Communication

Introduction

As long as there are relationships there will be conflict. Conflict is inevitable because no two personalities are alike. No matter how much people care for one another, conflicts arise because everyone has different needs. This paper will explore why conflict occurs, the role of personality types in conflict management, the positive and negative effects of conflict, communication techniques, and facework theory in regard to conflict management.



The Nature of Conflict

Interpersonal conflict can be thought of as a disagreement between people holding different views about an issue or having different behavioral styles that affect their ability to interact harmoniously. When two or more people have incompatible ideas or goals, they clash. This results in each person’s efforts to achieve their goals being frustrated, which creates a communication barrier. Everyone has goals; some goals are as simple as wanting a peaceful, relaxing evening, while others are complex, such as increasing the monthly revenue of a diverse sales department. When someone else has an idea contrary to the goal, or is at odds with how to achieve the same goal, the resulting interpersonal conflict disrupts the relationship between the involved parties.

Conflicts can occur between people even if they only perceive there is a problem. Cahn observes, “Whether or not people’s perceptions of the conflict situation are accurate, until they are able to confirm or change those perceptions, they act as though their perceptions are real” (Cahn, 2007, p. 5). Perceptions mean everything in conflict because they determine how successful the conflict resolution process will be. This is especially true in marital relationships.

Personality Types

Perceptions about others and the world are frequently based on personality types, which affect how we see conflict and attempt to resolve it. Dijkstra (2005) argues that “individuals high in agreeableness, extraversion and emotional stability interpret conflict situations differently from individuals that can be characterized as disagreeable, introvert and neurotic.” In addition to the level of agreeableness in individuals, nine Enneagram personality types clarify how people respond to conflict. These types are; the Reformer, the Helper, the Achiever, the Individualist, the Investigator, the Loyalist, the Enthusiast, the Challenger, and the Peacemaker (The Enneagram Institute. (n.d.). Each type handles conflict differently. Each personality has strengths and weaknesses that can either facilitate or impede the conflict resolution process. The following list summarizes how each type tends to handle conflict:

Reformers, achievers, and challengers address conflict when it arises. Reformers do so for ethical reasons and because of their sense of mission. Achievers do not put things off because they want to reach their goals. Challengers address conflict right away because they are self-confident and self-interested.

Helpers, peacemakers, and individualists would rather avoid conflict. Helpers avoid conflict because they do not want to risk hurting someone’s feelings. Peacemakers want harmony between everyone. Individualists would rather avoid conflict than put themselves on the line.

Investigators, enthusiasts, and loyalists are willing to engage in conflict resolution because they tend to be optimistic and they enjoy solving problems. They find it rewarding to make a difference in relationships and find innovative ways to resolve differences.

Interpersonal relationships at home and in the workplace can be improved greatly just by being aware of personality types and how they interact with others. Lynaugh (2006) posits;
As we look deeper at relationship awareness theory, it provides personal insight into what motivates us to behave and act the way we do, both when things are going well and when we are managing conflict. Each of the types mentioned above relate to conflict in different ways, and knowledge of how to handle disagreements and confrontations is key to maintaining a healthy workplace environment.
As stated in the forgoing, just knowing how various personalities deal with conflict can be a key in resolving problems when they come up instead of letting them build.

Positive and Negative Effects of Conflict

Conflict is often viewed as negative because there is a potential for “loss of face,” which will be addressed later. People think of conflict as two opposing forces which struggle against one another until one person arises victorious and the other goes down to defeat. However, conflict can bring positive outcomes if all parties desire to work toward a resolution that results in a win-win outcome, where everyone has at least a portion of their needs met. When conflict occurs within a group of people, it can become a time of creative brainstorming. Brookins (2012) suggests that “Conflict can also cause members to actively listen to each other as they work to accomplish the organizations’ goals.” When people have the same end-goal in view, they can work through their differences in how to achieve it.

The negative aspects of conflict occur when people avoid or ignore it for so long without addressing the issues, that problems mount, resentments and frustrations increase, and the situation ends up exploding into an ugly scene. Conflict gets a “bad rap” because too many people handle it badly. They do not have the skills to engage in constructive conflict management. Knowing how to constructively resolve problems in interpersonal relationships takes desire, effort, and self-discipline. One person can use good communication techniques and bring positive change, but conflict resolution is most successful when all individuals concerned are willing to work through their differences.

Communication Techniques

Conflict resolution can be achieved through the use of one or more techniques; some of which are more effective than others.  Three communication options are other-centered, self-centered, and relationship-centered. Other-centered communication focuses on the other person and neglects self, resulting in a win-lose outcome. Self-centered communication focuses on meeting the needs of self and disregarding the needs of the other party, resulting in a win-lose outcome. Relationship-centered communication is preferable because it takes into account the needs of all parties involved, which results in win-win outcomes.

The positive aspect of relationship-centered communication is that it allows for collaboration and the use of the S-TLC system. S-TLC advises a person in conflict to first Stop. Evaluate the situation and get emotions under control. Next, think and then listen to the other person before speaking. Finally, choose to communicate in a calm and mature manner with the goal in mind of finding a win-win solution.

Facework

Being able to save face, or in other words to maintain one’s self-image, is dependent on a process called facework. When people work together to address the issues, conflicts are more likely to be resolved and relationships can be preserved. Oetzel (2000) posits, “Facework has important implications for the quality of relationships. From the face-negotiation theory perspective, the quality to which face is managed during conflict will impact the quality of the relationship.” Facework takes effort, but it allows a person to preserve one’s own face or self-respect and preserves the face of the other party. In order to accomplish this, a repair sequence must be initiated. This involves asking the offending party for an explanation of their behavior, which may be “an excuse or justification, a concession, or an apology” (Cahn, 2007, p. 170), and finally an assessment of what happened. Only then can the real issues be addressed and the processes of reconciliation begin.

Conclusion

We have been able to determine the nature of conflict; its causes and inevitability, and explored how personality plays an important role in conflict management. Because conflicts in relationships will always exist since no two people are alike, they can best be managed if the involved parties have a positive view of conflict, realizing that it can be a catalyst for positive change. A wound can only be healed if the infection is cleaned and dressed. Likewise, conflict resolution and restoration of relationships can only occur when people are willing to earnestly address the issues with a win-win outcome in mind.


References
Askari, M., Noah, S., Hassan, S., & Baba, M.. (2012). Comparison the Effects of Communication and Conflict Resolution Skills Training on Marital Satisfaction. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(1), 182-195. Retrieved June 25, 2012, from Research Library. (Document ID: 2653991041).

Brookins, M. (2012). The Effects of Conflict Within an Organization. Hearst Communications. Retrieved from http://smallbusiness.chron.com/effects-conflict-within-organization-164.html

Cahn, D.D., & Abigail, R.A. (2007). Managing conflict through communication (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Dijkstra, M., Van Dierendonck, D., Evers, A., & De Dreu, C. (2005). Conflict and well-being at work: the moderating role of personality. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(1/2), 87-104. Retrieved June 25, 2012, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 813985351).

Lynagh, W., (2006). What's Your Type and Why Does It Matter? Physician Executive, 32(1), 24-
27. Retrieved June 25, 2012, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 969297631).

Oetzel, J., Ting-Toomey, S., Yokochi, Y., Masumoto, T., & Takai, J. (2000). A typology of facework behaviors in conflicts with best friends and relative strangers. Communication Quarterly, 48(4), 397-419. Retrieved June 25, 2012, from Research Library. (Document ID: 78299970).

The Enneagram Institute. (n.d.) Free Enneagram Test: The RHETI Sampler. Retrieved from http://www.enneagraminstitute.com/dis_sample_36.asp.

No comments:

Post a Comment